|
Choosing Between Oriented Strandboard and Plywood
Manufacturers of oriented strandboard and plywood claim
both products work well. But using panels made of wood chips makes some
builders nervous. Like it or not, osb will define the future of the structural
sheathing market.
By Paul Fisette - © 2005
The issue for most builders who choose between plywood and osb
is durability. Osb looks like, and is, a bunch of wood chips glued together.
Detractors of osb are quick to say: “osb falls apart”. This opinion has a
familiar tone. Plywood suffered the same criticism not too long ago.
Delamination of early plywood sheathings gave plywood a bad name. Many
“old-timers” swore by solid board sheathing until the day they hung up their
aprons. Not many builders share that view today.
Technical Merits
All 3 model building codes use the phrase “wood structural
panel” to describe the use of plywood and osb. Codes recognize these two
materials as the same. Likewise, APA the Engineered Wood Association, the
agency responsible for approving more than 75% of the structural panels used in
residential construction, treat osb and plywood as equals in their published
performance guidelines. And wood scientists agree that the structural
performance of osb and plywood are equivalent.
Osb and plywood share the same exposure durability
classifications: Interior, Exposure 1 (95% of all structural panels), Exposure
2 and Exterior. They share the same set of performance standards and span
ratings. Both materials are installed on roofs, walls and floors using one set
of recommendations. Installation requirements prescribing the use of H-clips on
roofs, blocking on floors and allowance of single-layer floor systems are
identical. The weights of osb and plywood are similar: 7/16-inch osb and 1/2-inch
plywood weigh in at 46 and 48 pounds. However, 3/4-inch Sturd-I-Floor plywood
weighs 70 pounds, 10 pounds less than its osb counterpart. Even the storage
recommendations are the same: keep panels off of the ground and protected from
weather.
Professor Poo Chow, a researcher at the University of Illinois,
studied the withdrawal and head pull-through performance of nails and staples
in plywood, waferboard and osb. Chow found that in both dry and 6-cycle aged
tests: osb and waferboard performed equal to or better than CD-grade plywood.
The results of another independent study conducted by Raymond LaTona at the Weyerhauser Technology
Center in Tacoma also showed that withdrawal strengths
in osb and plywood are the same. But, while the two products may perform the
same structurally, they are undeniably different materials. To begin with, the composition of each material is different.
Plywood is made from thin sheets of veneer that are cross-laminated and glued
together with a hot-press. Imagine the raw log as a pencil being sharpened in a
big pencil sharpener. The wood veneer is literally peeled from the log as it is
spun. Resulting veneers have pure tangential grain orientation, since the
slicing follows the growth rings of the log. Throughout the thickness of the
panel, the grain of each layer is positioned in a perpendicular direction to
the adjacent layer. There is always an odd number of layers in plywood panels
so that the panel is balanced around its central axis. This strategy makes
plywood stable and less likely to shrink, swell, cup or warp.
Logs are ground into thin wood strands to produce oriented
strandboard. Dried strands are mixed with wax and adhesive, formed into thick
mats, and then hot-pressed into panels. Don’t mistake osb for chipboard or
waferboard. Osb is different. The strands in osb are aligned. “Strand plies” are positioned as alternating layers that
run perpendicular to each other. This structure mimics plywood. Waferboard, a
weaker and less-stiff cousin of osb, is a homogeneous, random composition. Osb
is engineered to have strength and stiffness equivalent to plywood.
Performance is similar in many ways, but there are differences The National Oak Flooring Association (NOFA) in Memphis
recommends either 5/8-inch and thicker plywood, 3/4-inch osb or 1-x6-inch
dense, group1 softwood boards installed at a diagonal under hardwood flooring.
The NOFA recommendation is based on research conducted by Joe Loferski at
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. In his study, Loferski simulated what
happens on a real construction site. He built several full-sized floors out of
boards, plywood and osb and weathered them for 5 weeks before installing
hardwood flooring. Finished floor systems were cycled in an environmental
chamber to simulate the changes that occur in summer and winter months.
The study showed that solid boards installed at a diagonal
were far and away the best system. Statistically, 5/8-inch plywood and 3/4-inch
osb worked the same. But two significant observations were made during the
study: Some of the plywood delaminated during the weathering experiment and new
patches had to be spliced into the subfloor system. Also, researchers learned
that the best floor of all was the control specimen, which had been protected
from any weathering. This speaks volumes for the importance of protecting
materials during transport, storage and early stages of construction.
Wall sheathing: No news is good news. All
manufacturers of siding products I contacted agree that osb and plywood are
equals. Kevin Chung, Engineer with Western Wood Products Association in Seattle assures us,
“There have been no problems reported from the field. Nail-holding and racking
resistance are the same.” Chung has noticed some concern about the use of osb
among builders, but is quick to add, “There is no reason for any concern. Both
products serve equally well as a nailbase.” |